top of page

How the Best Boards Engage with Management

by Timothy J. Rowley and Laurence Capron, Harvard Business Review Magazine (Jan–Feb 2025)
by Timothy J. Rowley and Laurence Capron, Harvard Business Review Magazine (Jan–Feb 2025)

In every case, consider the context before you act


Boards today face a thorny challenge: how to provide proper oversight of management while allowing it the autonomy it needs to be effective. Too often, boards maintain a single mode of engagement at all times, regardless of the type of decision to be made or its importance. This lack of flexibility can significantly undermine board effectiveness, especially in complex and rapidly changing situations.


This article presents four modes of engagement – passive, mentor, partner and control – along with the unique characteristics of each. The key to becoming an agile board is to understand that the appropriate mode of engagement depends on the decision to be made.


Many factors can affect which board engagement mode is right for a given decision. However, the authors’ research reveals that four are critical: impact on value, conflicts of interest, implications for the mission, and talent and capabilities. Ultimately, agile boards not only enhance their own effectiveness but also foster a more collaborative and productive relationship with management, driving improved outcomes for organisations and their stakeholders. That is not just a nice-to-have – it’s a necessity.


View the full article here.



We are building a community of non-executive directors in emerging markets jurisdictions to elevate standards in corporate and climate governance.

Subscribe to our News

Thank you for subscribing!

Terms and Conditions | Privacy and Cookie Policy | Trading Terms
© 2025. The content on this website is owned by us and our licensors. Do not copy any content (including images) without our consent.

bottom of page